Freedoms of work

So many laws forbid any religious environment to exist between employees and customers. Many call this secular thought. It is actually a religion of secular humanism. It can be called a religion of non-belief. What it is slavery to your workplace. What they want is no deterrant to their workplace's metrics.It is supposed to be neutral place where work is done is what is said. I lived with this at workplaces before. It shouldn't be emphasized as a place freedom of religion gives hold to grace in the place of rights. Rights are not given to a company to keep while working. Rights are unalienable and permanent. Artistics overall is agreed upon between staff. If she wasn't in charge of art and wording to her superior, this is like speaking in tongues to some people. You dealing with the world and getting world's verdict. You must expect people to behave like that when they don't know better. Everyone's rights are suppressed in the workplace. There is a level of submission we all have to play to have order. Order is work ethically. Did you create disorder or help or subdue works with control. It is more a body decision that you decide a work culture together. An institution of work needs to follow an infinite reason. Following wise aspects to reason that works over and over is what should be regulated. If something doesn't work for a body of people to decide the culture's response to something regard rights it should work demographically otherwise God is positioning you for something. If everyone gets to decide artistic freedom with the full spirit of work. Was it work to put or say such things?

Was it edifying to your work those you served with your work? We must live in a way to stay at work and edify wisely. Now if you don't understand your work with God are you being wise enough to follow infinite reason. Artistic freedom needs to be work related if your at work. If work gives you time to freely talk you can use that time edify the body however you choose. This is the best economic and freedom decision. I talked to my boss about secular humanism effecting the culture one time we must be fairer that to make people see they have rights at work. We can edify with no judgement and dig to the root of our problems. Prostylitation should considered an amoral thing in a court of law, it can be good or bad depending how it is done. I would use business reasoning to justify any cause at work on work time. Personal reasons should be done in a personal spirit. Personal things are allowed in the culture during personal time. Including time allowed for personal things this includes types of prostylitation. This is how I would rule in the supreme court.