We have some impending situations on the debt and the fact of outsourcing to artificial intelligence.
First off regular robots for regular jobs should only be bought by consumers and not businesses. They will need workers to actually work for a while. I am talking about a regular robots taking jobs. If companies have the power to buy them then the economy will crash, so people.
Robots can't be bought by business in the place of people the government and the military must rule over it and let people or their robot get paid to keep the economy working. Robots can also be soldiers that the miltary controls.
If robot cost is really low people won't be able to earn money if they do better at it.
The government is also trying to get rid of debt. If companies owned parts of companies profits across the board we could get rid of the debt or at least neutralize it.
So if companies just took like 25% or a better figure per country. Something across the board is better. To stop illegal outsourcing.
WE COULD PAY OFF THE DEBT. We need to do this globally. So businesses can't change where they do business.
When all the countries have paid off their debt then we will give more back to business owners.
We want to be able to have free enterprise everywhere in the country. It is important to do that for the pursuit of happiness of all individuals involved. We can not take power from the individual in the place of others. When an individual or an entity come with an idea to the state we can not steal their idea because that individual sees it. That is conspiracy to steal ideas from another entity. It is not right when the state takes ideas from another entity for itself we must protect the individual. It is not right when people in high positions take away free enterprise of the individual first.
The state is an autonomous corporate body in function balancing to perserve rights. We can not use a personal opinion to vote we represent the people and that's how we vote. If the state steals ideas then it is a slippery slope of power over the people for business. The people rule over the state not the other way around. Business is free enterprise. Free enterprise does not take away people's rights. The right to steal should not be passed in handling business of any entity. Personal freedom should be protected.
So in the case of the state making money off the people it should be done without taking personal freedoms away to build the state. Nor should the state act like a merchant. A merchant makes money off of people but not personal expense of freedoms of the individual. So for vendors at a local park they should be functioning in a way that edifies the people as a whole. Ideas should be protected from other entities that which steal ideas so it should be enforced that the ideas don't go to someone else.It would be hypocritical to take from other organizations without their wholehearted permission. We don't hinder freedom where it is ethical. In what we mean is we don't take from the poor and give to the rich or informed. To bid on something the government takes from the individual or entity is unfair taking freedom from the idea holder so it is not ethical to take something. For my idea I do not give permission for it to be given to someone else.
State entities work with other vending machines companies, it is presented else where to allow business in parks. It should be handled as unconsitutional to not allow entities to gather in public places. It is a freedom of gathering, even if the representive isn't physically there but has persence, the pursuit of happiness is the jurisiction of the individual or entity to spend time in a public place is constitutional even if it seems unconventional to a party. Each party has a right to gather in free enterprise in public and so with a public place as long as an entity actions are ethical. The state can come up with ideas on regulated things that keep personal safety concerned. We protect business as a whole as it part of body of things that must be protected including personal freedom where ethical. Business must remain a body of the people acting in a perserving the rights of the whole carry out their business.
The park taking away general rights to gather to edify their business should not take place as long as safety is concerned. The thought of safety needs to be built on actual evidence and not paranoia. We don't know the actions of vandals and abusers of entities to make it unethical to gather. Let us edify citizens with their pursuits of happiness.
It's unconstitutional to hinder another's freedom within an ethical context. It must be protected. Operating a business should always be encouraged as a freedom instead of a hinderance when it comes to acting as or with a unbiased corporate antonymous entity like the government, freedom should be encouraged as a constitutional and permitted as freedom. Operation of business should not be hindered in conjunction with a public entity to enforce freedom of individuals to not be unconstitutional. The pursuit of happiness has jurisdiction.
