An ‘Oversight’ solution you may not have seen with the green energy and overall charging sector.
Looking at this may save in research money and time.
If we do research to put more than one plug in the car at once we may lower the charge time.
We simply use more power supplies and measure out what will charge the vehicle. One power unit may be better if the power units are stacked. One plug mindedness is too much in the presentation therefore it is an oversight out of all the plugs your thinking there has to be one plug in the car at once. People don’t care to plug more than one plug in their car if it means a quicker charge time. Their care is a quicker charge time not how many plugs I put in it.
People would laugh to put 4 or 5 plugs in a car until they have alot of robots. Its look unprofessional so you say it not the answer but if it means I wait 10 minutes longer to leave the then people won’t care as much. People plug things in all the time. One plug mindedness is rampant at tesla and it effects your research and the research of others in the business leaving gaps in your research in charge time. I have watch thousands of charging,battery, company vehicle research new material research and none focus on bring the charge time down by multiple plugs.
This research maybe the reason the charge time maybe cut down in a cheaper battery to gas fill up times with charging capabilities. Multiple plugs isn’t thought about so that may give you possibilities even under the charging time barriers.
Aluminum ion battery charging maybe what your going with but you may have better options after you do more tests. I have viewed much of the tesla media regarding charging,batteries and its cars. Sectioned off charging in the charge for multiple plugs you could also tesgroup plugs tethered together if they are all together you can see the combinations.
A combined plug maybe part of your engineering but its not part of your charge stations. You may not have done the combination tests in this oversight. Your goal maybe one plug but people don’t want to wait longer than gassing up.
I want to use under neath is something you can do too.So whatever you can do combination charging. You can bring down the charge time that way.
Looking at sodium ion liquid phosphate with thicker hydrogen bonds maybe the plan though you know what your doing.
I want you think about what you done with pride, but don’t let pride build you into oversight in your testing, research, and optimization.
If we make a solution to a battery charging with ‘combination charging.’ You can make more money on ‘current’ solutions and bring down charging time. It could also be used for robot charging the on the car.
Current oversight committee maybe good to form.
I want batteries to charge faster than expected not longer. ‘Longer’ is going to effect the economy and the charge time. I know they said there won’t be any charge cables for cell phones I hope this research I heard on the radio applies to cars which heard on klove radio a couple weeks ago. Applies to your readiness to roll out a ‘charge system.’ that works.
If you have any questions I send this out to those in your research department to see how viable it is to you.
Also you may want to include the cycle charge system to that to make ‘genius’ charging.
Where one set of batteries charge another set of batteries according which sets have the most charge or a central computer that see the charge of each to even charge batteries to make it last longer.
The charge units can charge particular batteries, not just the whole unit. You have an emergency recharging battery in the car to keep the unit going longer. You can have section recharging another section. This is another oversight. People don’t have the car recharging itself with another battery. More when one set gets lower another set charge creating recharge charge cycle in the car. I gave this to one researcher but the research was buried if not known at all. I want these things looked at for overall efficiency.
You can put also put a nest light chip that turns your lights off and on from your car has an installed chip to turn lights on for your car.Include security encryption with a pin or password for turning off lights or turning on really bright lights. It is better with a password people don’t want anyone turning off the lights or disorienting someone for a second.
They are going to have demand on the grid in a car and on trips with robots. Most people are going to turn their robots off to charge because they don't want their speed reported. They need a car mode on the robots where they turn off while you drive. Plus they are unpredictable. They will need outlets for the robots in the car. Most people will have them charge at night. Truck stops need outlets for robots. Outlets in the trucks too. They could charge robots at the same time as vehicles. Bottom car chargers like electrify could be used to charge the cars in parking spots and charge robots. We need to average out the load that people want with and without robots. They can put an extra battery for all the robots in the car. Imagine a bus full. or an 18 wheeler/or van/ or flying car with robotic charging. If we can do that with that Lambo battery then we would be good. We need to realize the bit load and the electric load. With multiple plugs we can bring down the charge time. Putting solar panel strips on the robot can make battery last longer, people are going to want that on the robots to make the battery last longer. Have a deactivation program for robots in the car with some 'advanteous' off features it can do where it not a back seat driver.
Sincerely,
Michael Wilkinson
Battery researcher
Ceo and consultant of discipleshipadvisors.com
No comments:
Post a Comment